First, Parts of this Document are Hidden Click Here to View Entire Document . Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The West Wing, The Takings Clause and Tom Merrill: Ah, great post, Kurt. So perhaps the writers of the West Wing episode read and understand Prof. Merrill’s position and so wrote him into the show. Jonas fell as he stepped off the curb. From the EPA; The Senate; Cornell Law School; Early transcript of the Bill of Rights: 1791; Bill of Rights from Historicaldocumuments.com; The Text of the Fifth Amendment (Encyclopedia of Everyday Law | Fifth Amendment) Find Law; National Constitution Center Get in contact with us! Toby tells C.J. A list of items can be punctuated like this: We need … But this narrowing language does not necessarily mean that the Clause imposes an affirmative requirement that a taking must be for a “public use.” It is also possible that the Framers were simply describing the type of taking for which just compensation must be given – a taking of property by eminent domain as opposed to some other type of taking, such as a taking by tort or taxation.”, This testimony is almost identical to Prof. Merrill’s Amicus brief on behalf of the American Planning Association (at p. Corp., 300 U.S. 55, 80 (1937).” (Amicus brief at p.4). Posted by: Al Brophy | May 11, 2006 1:14:50 PM. Rule 3c. The passage he was referring to is as follows and the comma in question is bolded and bracketed: "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the sa… In other cases, a relative clause may be essential. The core of each clause is a verb or action word, often accompanied by a subject or object. Cristina has written to ask how we use commas in relative clauses. Its being mentioned on the West Wing. There are others. England's Magna Carta did not require compensation for government … Incorrect: He walked all the way home and he shut the door. that he thinks that he has found a typo in the Constitution, specifically in the Takings Clause. The Takings Clause, with its narrow ban on "direct" takings of physical property, precisely remedied these two problems. Modern readers frequently find the usage of commas – or the lack thereof – to be quite strange. http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_Am5.html, Planning Commissopmers Kpirma; - Planners Web, Heritage Foundation article which quotes the passage, An early draft of the Bill of Rights from July 28, 1789, Another Copy of the Bill of Rights (Democaratic Freedom Caucus), Still another version of the Bill of Rights, The Legal Dictionary, the Free Dictionary, Another Copy of the Bill of Rights (Passed by Congress September 25, 1789. As such, it may have the greatest effect on the syntactic analysis of a sentence. 4.). In those circumstances, we call it a defining relative clause. Thanks to Kai. Can we read Prof. Merrill’s argument as saying that since the original does not include the two commas around “for public use” that “for public use” does not constitute a separate constraint on the government’s eminent domain power? Appositives act as synonyms for a … Here is another rule that everyone agrees on: Do not use … A nonrestrictive clause offers extra information about something you have mentioned in a sentence, but the information isn’t essential to identify the thing you’re talking about. When you need a comma before “where”
PageViews Since October 3, 2005, Professor of Law
So here are two very easy easy things to remember. Ratified December 15, 1791), Early transcript of the Bill of Rights: 1791, Bill of Rights from Historicaldocumuments.com, The Text of the Fifth Amendment (Encyclopedia of Everyday Law | Fifth Amendment), http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/charters_downloads.html, Arlen Specter Eminent Domain Hearing Blasts Columbia Law Professor Thomas Merrill, The Columbia Journalist" "New Congressional Bill May Alter Legal Limbo for Guantanamo Bay Prisoners" Randall Kennedy's book on the N-word was the subject of a Boston Public episode some years ago, as I recall. that he thinks that he has found a typo in the Constitution, specifically in the Takings Clause. var sc_invisible=0;
Where is Toby Ziegler’s “missing comma” under a Merrill-type theory? © Copyright 2004-2018 by Law Professor Blogs, LLC. With the supposed “missing commas” it would read: “nor shall private property be taken, for public use, without just compensation.”. What was that about Toby finding a typo in the Constitution? If you remove it, the sentence still has meaning (The girl is three years old). In sentences where two independent clauses are joined by connectors such as and, or, but, etc., put a comma at the end of the first clause. Funk (nd) suggested that "The Takings Clause imposes two requirements on government in order to exercise this power. Our dedicated law and tax experts in over 70 offices provide clients with advice in a wide range of law and tax matters. In historical context, the narrow scope of the Takings Clause is hardly surprising. Many writers wouldn’t be able to resist the temptation to stick a comma between Drive and unless even though it’s not strictly necessary. Yes--when law profs make that jump to pop culture, that's a sure sign they've arrived. Toby tells C.J. If the subordinate clause follows the main clause, no comma is usually needed: Steer clear of Rodeo Drive unless you have a lot of money. Using “Which” in a Restrictive Clause. A reader asked about commas with subordinate—also known as dependent—clauses.Because the topic covers several issues and because I was already working on one of the sub-topics for another article, I thought I’d answer the question in an article rather than in the comment section. Posey’s Cafe, which Chester recommended, is a fantastic restaurant. If the clause with as comes first, a comma is generally required. Comma with Nonrestrictive Clause. [An UPDATE to this post is available here]. You usually put a comma before and when it’s connecting two independent clauses. Behold, now you have the equivalent of constitutional theorists obsessing over the Takings clause comma, only now it’s over a text that nobody even voted for! In his Amicus, Prof. Merrill acknowledges that his “only a subset of takings” is not accepted as a general interpretation: “Nevertheless, “for public use” has been read throughout our history as imposing an implied limitation on the exercise of eminent domain – that it can be used only for public and not private uses – and this Court has accepted this interpretation. I figure the issue is the comma after "for public use" and before "without just compensation." On Sunday’s episode, former White House Communications Director Toby Ziegler, in talking to Chief of Staff C.J. A lot of people have strong feelings about putting a comma before and in a list. But this narrowing language does not necessarily mean that the Clause imposes an affirmative requirement that a taking must be for a “public use.” It is also possible that the Framers were simply describing the type of taking for which … Commas are one way that we add extra (non-essential) information to sentences. The information in the adjective clause, separated by commas, is extra information. In his September 20, 2005 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the Kelo v. New London decision, Prof. Merrill repeats his somewhat unique interpretation of the Takings Clause – an interpretation which could be said to rest on a “missing comma.”, In relevant part, discussing the myths of Kelo, Prof. Merrill argues: “Myth Four: The original understanding of the Takings Clause limits the use of eminent domain to cases of government ownership or public access … Unfortunately, other than the language of the Takings Clause itself (“nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation”), there is virtually no direct evidence about what the Framers understood by the words “for public use.” The phrase modifies “taken,” and thus clearly establishes that the Takings Clause is about a subset of takings – those for public use as opposed to other possible types of takings.
A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network, The West Wing, The Takings Clause and Tom Merrill, thoughts on this earlier in the week at the Land Use Law Profs Blog, September 20, 2005 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Amicus brief on behalf of the American Planning Association, Join Amazon Prime - Watch Over 40,000 Movies, UMKC Seeks Visitor in Property, Real Estate Transactions, Fair & Affordable Housing, Peter Gerhart: Remembering a Scholar and a Friend to All, Symposium: Dagan and the Liberal Theory of Property, Mandelker on Sign Ordinances and Free Speech. Having your article cited in a SCOTUS decision? Brown v. Legal Found. If You Use a Serial Comma, Use it Consistently. Use commas to offset appositives from the rest of the sentence. The word “where” is used at the start of a specific type of clause called a relative clause. He says the National Archives can’t explain whether it is a comma or a smudge. nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Copyright Policy. of Washington, 538 U.S. 216, 231-32 (2003); Thompson v. Consol. It'd be interesting to know about other instances. Use a pair of commas in the middle of a sentence to set off clauses, phrases, and words that are not … StatCounter
Toby then indicates he has put in a call to Tom Merrill. "https://secure." Legal Definition of takings clause : a clause in the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution stating that private property cannot be taken for public use without just … Often, you can identify a defining relative clause … Because is a subordinating conjunction , which means that it connects a subordinate clause to an independent clause; good style dictates that there should be no comma between these two clauses. With the comma: "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Gas Utils. The "Takings Clause", the last clause of the Fifth Amendment, limits the power of eminent domain by requiring "just compensation" be paid if private property is taken for public use. There are never commas around a restrictive clause. It probably should be the lack of 2 commas surrounding “for public use.” In official versions of the constitution, the Takings Clause reads: “nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.” No commas in the original. and … B) Edinburgh, where I went to university, is a beautiful city. var scJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? Toby's alleged typo was from the "takings" clause of the Fifth Amendment:" . 1) Compare: A) The place where I went to school is a wonderful town. The concept that there can be a regulatory taking—that a land use regulation can be so restrictive as to constitute a taking of private property—was first set forth in 1922 in Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon. Nah. You have a point here. Nonrestrictive clauses are usually introduced by which or who and should be set off by commas. Most of the time, you should not use a comma before because when it connects two clauses in a sentence. Correct: He walked all the way home, and he shut the door. var sc_security="a46cc76a";
The phrase modifies “taken,” and thus clearly establishes that the Takings Clause is about a subset of takings – those for public use as opposed to other possible types of takings. As the plane was taking off, Erica fell asleep. It’s almost always optional to put a comma before and in a list. (as =while) As I'm a pacifist, I'm against all wars. Publishing in Harvard or Yale Law Review? All rights reserved. What is wrong with this sentence? ** restrictive relative clause= they tell us which person or thing, or which kind of person or thing, is meant; non-restrictive relative clause = they tell us more about a person or thing that is already identified. . var sc_project=9928625;
In official versions of the constitution, the Takings Clause reads: “nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.” No commas in the original. Clauses are best thought of as the parts a sentence can be broken down into. Comma Before And in Lists. Don't Use a Comma to Join Two List Items. Help support PropertyProf Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you. The "Takings Clause" of the U.S. Constitution states simply "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." The clause provided greater protection for the property owner than the property owner had traditionally received.
It is described as "restrictive" because it restricts the meaning of the word it modifies. Main article: Eminent domain in the United States. conjunction to link them (Field, 2009) or use a semicolon. Paul Boudreaux had some thoughts on this earlier in the week at the Land Use Law Profs Blog. without compensation. There’s no single rule that applies to all situations. Some writers omit the comma if the clauses are both quite short: Example: I paint and he writes. If the non-essential clause appears at the end of the sentence, you would only need one comma to set it apart from the rest of the sentence. *** When an appositive is only one word, no comma is needed. Tom Merrill, of course, is a noted Takings Clause expert at Columbia Law School. var sc_text=2;
In the show’s seventh season, character Toby Ziegler thinks he’s found an “inconsistent comma’’ in the takings clause of the constitution. "); document.write("");
However, in the last quarter century, that clause has taken on a prominent role in constitutional jurisprudence, particularly with respect to the limits of state and local regulatory power. One could read Prof. Merrill’s position as “the case of the missing comma.” Certainly, arguments made from the peculiar (to modern sensibilities) grammatical structure of the Constitution are nothing new. (as =when) She stayed home as she had no car. But note that too broad an interpretation of this sentence, or some other part of the Federalist, would likely run afoul of the Constitution itself. Takings Clause Takings Clause; Takings Clause Definition. the property to be acquired must be "for public use," and second, the government must pay "just compensation" to the owner of the property that is taken. The reference to the Takings Clause, a missing comma and Tom Merrill is either too cute by half or an indication that some script writer is really paying attention. Non-essential, nonrestrictive clauses should be set off from the rest of the sentence with a set of commas. By Meredith Kolodner, An introduction to the BBC's "Blake's 7", No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use. (as =because) If the clause with as comes second, a comma is generally not required. What is the ultimate honor for a law professor? Astute watchers of the show may recall in season 5, during a constitutional crisis regarding Presidential succession, that Yale Prof Akhil Amar was mentioned. A provision of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution that requires just compensation to be paid to the owner of private property taken for public use. It is also called a "defining clause," which, I think, is a more accurate term. The girl — who is carrying a bag — is three years old.
: "http://www. clauses separated by a comma is wron g, either put a full stop between them or use a . The often-quoted conclusion of Justice Holmes in this case was, “while property may be regulated to a certain extent, if regulation goes too far it will be recognized as a taking.”The U.S. Supreme Court has confirmed that compensation, not just invalidation, is the appropriate remedy when there is a regulatory taking, eve… Eminent domain. Exactly why this particular quirk of comma usage stirs such passions is hard to say; it’s just … Any discussion of the Takings Clause should begin with the history that led to its … Cregg, claims to have discovered a typo in the Constitution in the Takings Clause – specifically a missing comma. When introducing a restrictive clause, the words "who" and "which" can be replaced with "that." [Comments are held for approval, so there will be some delay in postion], https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/property/2006/05/the_west_wing_t.html, https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d834899e9153ef. This blog is an Amazon affiliate. The Supreme Court has long construed the … Tulane University Law School. Lack of a comma takings clause comes before coming to work i confused, what value might create the podcast! Kerry was one about a comma in clause requires the circumstances involved, if searching for him a restrictive appositive? Head and others, she ran down the bushes. The comma is the most common form of punctuation. University of Iowa College of Law, A.D. Freeman Professor of Civil Law
.