270 vs 270 wsm recoil

Posted by 6 days ago.270 win vs .270 WSM? Like with the smaller data set, the.270 Win rounds are producing a much greater amount of recoil energy than the.243 Win, on average. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .270 WSM Winchester Short Magnum vs … There is a very good selection of bullets in .270 caliber, ranging from about 90-180 grains. Create more recoil by 15% than the 6.5 version. As you can see, the trend is very similar to what we saw above. So with recoil in mind, let’s take a look at several ballistic characteristics of the 7mm-08 vs .270. In this cartridge comparison, we are going to take a look two cartridges, the 7mm-08 Rem and the .270 Win. gives all the velocity any rifleman would need, within sane hunting ranges. Many hunters preferred to carry “Jack’s two-seventy” afield each season, and nearly every rifle maker offered the cartridge in their lineup, whether it was a bolt-action, semi-automatic or pump. 13 janvier 2014 à 13 h 02 min #4825443. Besides, to achieve those impressive numbers, the 270 will need a standard amount … Thread starter #1. georgiaboy2109 Banned. Like the .270 Weatherby Magnum—released 60 years prior to the .270 WSM—it betters the velocity of the .270 Winchester, but … Why? The release of the .270 Winchester in 1925 in the Winchester Model 54 rifle saw the beginning of the American love affair with velocity, as well as the laying of a solid foundation for the American bolt-action sporting rifle. My condolences to those poor misguided souls. Does a 270 kick less than a .338 mag YES. Importantly, it does so without beating up the shooter. The .270 Win certainly isn’t unwieldy and we don’t think its recoil eliminates it from the discussion, but the numbers show there is a clear difference between the two cartridges. I don't like recoil but the 270 WSM … The 270 Winchester is the winner in most categories, but not by a wide margin. The .270 WSM is expensive but very fast. For over 75 years the .270 Winchester reigned supreme within that bore diameter, having only the .270 Weatherby Magnum as its competition. Close. From there the 30-06 will give you a greater selection of bullets and ammunition which for me, gives it the edge over the 270. Nov 20, 2011 #1. is slightly stiffer. 70 in an H-S Precision stock. Can't tell the between it and my Remongton Mountain rifle in .270. Since practice is crucial to any successful hunt, and the .308 Win. For a more extensive look at more rounds, here are the averages for all forty rounds that we have compiled. vs. .458 Lott• 7mm Rem. Winchester Model 70 chambered in 7mm Remington Magnum & Remington Model 700 chambered in .270 Winchester. has not. Caliber Battle: .308 Win. Postes : 921; Bonjour, pour moi, le c’est le 270WSM le plus polyvalent des deux. I plan on getting a 270wsm and than rebarreling when the barrels shot out or if it doesn't live up to expectations for accuracy with a 6.5wsm barrel. Have one and love it. I had a 300wsm that with 180's in a savage with a tupperware stock was downright nasty! 270 vs 308 Ballistics. I have a really heavy 30-06 Mauser and the numbers said even with the 180 gr it would be close to the fairly light 25-06 with 120 gr that I can tolerate and indeed it's not bad. In stalled a Limbsaver pre-fit recoil pad on my Tikka T3 Lite .270WSM. Did a slow motion capture of the recoil from a .270 WSM Remington 700 shooting 130 grain bullets. The recoil of some hard hitting cartridges. has more range in terms of bullet weights (110 grains to 240 grains vs. 90 grains to 180 grains), but both calibers can take everything from varmints and predators to elk, moose, and bears. Recoil generated by a .270 Winchester is just a shade past comfortable, but it's not painful. Mag. With a range of bullet weights between 90 and 150 grains, it could easily handle woodchucks and coyotes, as well as black bear. J’en connais deux en utilisation mixte, battue de gros et chevreuils, dont l’un est utilisé en plus pour le chamois en haute montagne. GECO TM 1/2 Blindée 270 WSM 140Gr. Nov 20, 2011 #1. Here are some specifications of interest to .270 WSM reloaders: bullet diameter .277", maximum COL 2.86", maximum case length 2.10". We can shorten the gentleman's wait time with a quick ballistic comparison right here, including some handling, weight, and recoil differences between these two excellent mid-power cartridges. I hear a 270WSM recoils about like a standard weight 30.06. 97.41 € 80.99 € Add to cart. Many bullet options for reloading. Sa vitesse à la sortie du canon est de 821 m/s. Contributing Member Gordon Contributing Member. Ultimately want the overall performance down range (and within 100yds..) on game to be what makes the decision. I can get 3230fps with the 130gn InterBond in my .270 WSM which means that Hornady should be able to equal that with a Superformance load for the .270 WSM. As you can see, the two cartridges have almost identical amounts of recoil with the 270 WSM in this particular example actually having a tiny bit less free recoil energy than the .270 Winchester. I've also never shot a rifle in either the 6.5 PRC or .270 WSM and want to factor in recoil into the equation but not make it the ultimate reason for the selection. Le 270 WSM possède donc un volume de douille de 10,70% inférieure à celle du 270 Weatherby Magnum, alors que le 270 Winchester possède un volume de douille qui est de 10,67% inférieur a celui de ce nouveau calibre. The .270 will have slightly less recoil than the .30-06 or .308, but the difference is not real noticeable. I've also never shot a rifle in either the 6.5 PRC or .270 WSM and want to factor in recoil into the equation but not make it the ultimate reason for the selection. I figured the bore was only 0.013 smaller but I'd have access to more options for reloading. I owned a .270 WSM for 10 years, but I used it a lot. Pushing a 150-grain bullet to 3250 fps, the .270 WSM certainly earns the Magnum title, but at what cost? It’s been putting meat on the table and trophies on the wall for nearly a century, and based on sales figures, I don’t suspect that will change any time soon. vs. .300 Win. Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3. I owned a .270 WSM for 10 years, but I used it a lot. - TonyMT My condolences to those poor misguided souls. The .270 is about twice as much, but still VERY light. That said, the .270 doesn't have a lot of bullet choice at this point. This dashboard combines 270 vs. 30 06, trajectory, velocity, and energy data ranging from Muzzle to 500 yards. If you are recoil shy, just have a 1" decelerator installed and you probably won't notice that you're shooting a magnum cartridge. We put 3 popular cartridges to a head-to-head-to-head test Any thoughts or suggestions would be great! so why would I limit myself to the bullet selection of 270? The .270 WSM is also capable of excellent accuracy but prefers slow-burning powders. I have a pre-64 Mod. Any heavier than that and you’ll lose stability, so while the .270 Winchester and WSM are both good, flat-shooting hunting cartridges, neither make a sound choice for today’s long-range shooting. Of course, where I live, a box of .257 Weatherby cartridges retails for almost exactly three times as much as a box of .270 cartridges ($45 compared to $15 at my local discount store as I write these words). The .270 is about twice as much, but still VERY light. bullets in both rifles and can say that the recoil in the WSM is a bit more stout than the standard .270. It is my long range gun. My 270 WSM is a Tikka T3 Lite with a Sims Limb Saver recoil pad on it. vs. .300 WSM• .223 Remington vs. .22-250 Remington, E-mail your comments/questions about this site to: EmediaHunter@nrahq.org, For questions/comments about American Hunter magazine, please e-mail:Publications@nrahq.org, You can contact the NRA via phone at: NRA Member Programs1-800-672-3888, To advertise on American Hunter, visit nramediakit.com for more information. The bore diameter of the .270 Winchester—.277″—is not exactly a very popular one; there are very few other cartridges using this bore diameter, certainly fewer than the 6.5mm, 7mm and .30s that surround it. by Philip Massaro - In all honesty, with the exception of the .300 WSM (and even that seems to be on the wane) the WSM line seems destined for obscurity. By necking down the .30-06 case to shoot smaller diameter bullets, the designers of the .270 Winchester built a cartridge with a higher velocity, flatter trajectory, and less recoil than the .30-06 Springfield. Many options for reloading there as well. Chuck Hawks’s rifle recoil table puts hard data to this subjective impression: Both calibers record similar recoil energies, though the .308 Win. With a little over 8ft.lbs of recoil energy, you will definitely be able to tell a difference when shooting these two cartridges. Nov 20, 2011 #2. jguffie Senior Member. Get a good used .270 Winchester. It will still have plenty of energy for mule deer and is why thousands of hunters use the 270 Win and 270 WSM. 270 WSM probably has more factory options, but if you're looking to set this up to shoot heavies specifically then there are more factory PRC options that are heavy for caliber. The WSM will have even more recoil. Le plus rapide est le 270 WSM trop rapide en battue. Both have been popular from their inceptions. If you're looking into 1000 yard shooting, good bullet choice is going to be important. I'm considering getting a .270 WSM in either the Kimber Montana or the Classic. shotgun and load in a breakopen vs. say an 1100. both … is several pounds heavier and I use around 11-12 grs. Pros: Better performance at medium ranges. With a 35˚ shoulder, and a 2.100″ case—the same as the .308 Winchester—the .270 WSM performs as advertised, giving a 200-250 fps advantage over its older sibling. Most of your felt recoil lies with in the type of rifle you are shooting vs. bullet weight. more powder in the WSM. It wasn’t all marketing hype though; the .270 Winchester is a flat-shooting cartridge, perfect for deer and similar-sized game. I'm trying to put together a "classic" hunting rifle, mainly for white-tail but also to be able to reach out in the event I get to do some mule-deer or similar hunts out west. Compound that with the feeding problems that the WSM line of cartridges can exhibit—I’ve seen a few rifles that feed reliably, but most are finicky at best—and the way the short, fat case quickly eats up magazine space, and I feel the original .270 Winchester makes a better design than does the WSM. Not always a fantastic component bullet that is why I went with the lighter 270 in 130. Impressive ammunition. Anyway, I always use 150 gr. Some might argue that the .270 is more cartridge than one needs for whitetails. What you get with the .270 WSM is about 150-200 fps more than you get with the standard cartridge. Mag. The WSM will have even more recoil. You can … The 270 win with the 150 LRAB is going to be right on the 280AIs heels. .270 win vs .270wsm. Both of these cartridges became popular in the shooting world because of their ballistic characteristics, especially the trajectory, and the low recoil while still can bring down medium and even larger sized game. If economical ammo is of importance, then forget about the .270. The thing to remember though is that in my case, the .270 Win. Mag. i have 2 friends who love their WSMs... they seem to kick a little more shareply than a .270 win. Had Winchester changed the twist rate, allowing the .270 to run heavy bullets, we may never have heard of the 6.5 Creedmoor, but alas, history is history. vs. .300 Win. I think the 270 or 7mm wsm's would be quite reasonable with a decent recoil pad and stock. The 270 WSM is going to be a tad ahead of the 280AI. Does anyone have an opinion on the .270 WSM versus the other 2 calibers? Does a .270 kick less than the same rifle in 30-06 NOT REALLY! We've got you covered.• .26 Nosler vs. 6.5-300 Weatherby Magnum• .458 Win. It is not uncomfortable at the range if I shoot 25 or 30 rounds through it. A .308 is tried and true, and will haul the mail. Comparer. Jack O’Connor’s championing of the .270 Winchester may have been the best ringing endorsement of any cartridge if the 20th century; it became the favorite of millions of deer hunters, as well as those in pursuit of the wild sheep that Jack loved so much. Recoil is a moot point unless you are comparing identical rifles with different chamberings. I've owned a whole raft of 7mm's in all kinds of configurations - so I'm going to play the game with .280 vs 7mm Short Mag (pretty much the same scenario as the .270 win vs 270 WSM) Not much to choose between the two, if I had to pick one or the other, I usually reach past the Short mag and the .280 gets to go hunting. Thats from memory and not verified. Both are excellent cartridges. Thread starter #1. georgiaboy2109 Banned. You can run a 162 at 3000 with a .625 BC with a 280AI. IMO, if Remington had come out with 280 first, the "270 vs 280" argument would have never become a thing - 270 would be a minor foot note of interest to people like Boddington and a few others. You can filter for 30 06 Springfield and 270 Winchester for this comparison, or you can compare the 270 Winchester or 30 06 Springfield to any of the other calibers in the list. I have both calibers in Model 70's. In the real world, firearms chambered for less powerful cartridges are typically built lighter than firearms chambered for more powerful cartridges. If you're looking into 1000 yard shooting, good bullet choice is going to be important. Like any .270 Magnum, the WSM version has too much powder capacity for the light 90-120 grain bullets. Re: Felt recoil difference between the .270 Win and .270 WSM? 270 vs 308 Ballistics. .270 win vs .270wsm. Friday, October 12, 2018. The felt recoil of any of the three cartridges will be just about the same. What you get with the .270 WSM is about 150-200 fps more than you get with the standard cartridge. Yeah, I'm a 27 cal. In my opinion, one of the drawbacks of all three of the .270s is their twist rate. The recoil numbers you calculate on the various web sites I think are pretty good (based on rifle weight, bullet weight and powder capacity, etc) and in my experience once you get the calibration of the numbers to your desired recoil limit they are a good indicator. Thread starter georgiaboy2109; Start date Nov 20, 2011; Nov 20, 2011. I am thinking about rebarreling one of my 6.5WSMs to 270WSM now that the LRAB is available. Recoil generated by a .270 Winchester is just a shade past comfortable, but it's not painful. I've felt that my WSM's recoil is more of a long "push" than a sharp "punch" in comparison to my 280. My 270 with 130gr bullets doesnt seem to kick hard at all, at least no more than the 30-30's I've ever shot. Why? 1. Mag.• .243 Winchester vs. 6mm Remington• 7x57mm Mauser vs. 7mm-08 Remington• .25-06 Remington vs. .257 Weatherby Magnum• .338 Winchester vs. .375 H&H Magnum• .30-30 Winchester vs. .35 Remington• .257 Roberts vs. .250-3000 Savage• .270 Winchester vs. .280 Remington• .35 Whelen vs. 9.3x62mm Mauser• .416 Rigby vs. .416 Remington Magnum• .308 Winchester vs. .30-06 Springfield• .22 Nosler vs. .224 Valkyrie• .300 Win. Cons: Lengthy action and heavier gun. The .270 WSM is expensive but very fast. In addition to my .270 Win., I also have a Kimber .270 WSM. the .270 with todays modern bullet choices is an outstanding allrounder and can do it to 600 yards well if set up for it, the 06 can too but its going to recoil more running 180's to match impact velocities at same distances as a .270 running 140's, the .270 wsm takes those same minimum necessary impact velocities to about 750 yards with same 140's to give an idea of … Copyright © 2000-2020 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved. It uses bullets from 100 to 150 grains, which can easily reach 2,900 and even 3000 frames per second. Happy Thanksgiving! This round is a great combination between a flat trajectory and moderate recoil. Very light recoil even with 100gr bullets. Does the perfect muley cartridge really exist? My calculations indicate recoil in similar weight rifles at 18.5 ft/lbs for the 270 WSM and 15.75 ft/lb for the .270 Winchester when both are loaded to top speeds with a 130gn bullet. My calculations indicate recoil in similar weight rifles at 18.5 ft/lbs for the 270 WSM and 15.75 ft/lb for the .270 Winchester when both are loaded to top speeds with a 130gn bullet. My 270 WSM is a Tikka T3 Lite with a Sims Limb Saver recoil pad on it. And the 7mm-08 Remington beats it is some comparisons. That said, the .270 doesn't have a lot of bullet choice at this point. The case is slightly longer than the .30-06—the .270 actually has the same length as the earlier .30-03, at 2.540-inch—and represents one of the early ‘fast’ cartridges to come onto the scene. WildRose Well-Known Member. the .270 WSM certainly has the power to be a good 1000 yard shooter. more powder in the WSM. 270 WSM probably has more factory options, but if you're looking to set this up to shoot heavies specifically then there are more factory PRC options that are heavy for caliber. Seen from this perspective, only the .257 Weatherby makes any kind of sense, as at least its recoil is on a par with the .270 Winchester. If the barrel lengths are fairly close the mzl reports will be similar albeit a bit more with the WSM. The 300 WSM and 325 WSM also have the benefit of doing all of the above with a modest decrease in recoil compared to the .300 Win Mag and .338 Win Mag while the 270 WSM offers a definite improvement in velocity over the .270 Winchester. bullets in both rifles and can say that the recoil in the WSM is a bit more stout than the standard .270. It will still have plenty of energy for mule deer and is why thousands of hunters use the 270 Win and 270 WSM. I am not all that familiar with the WSM 270 round, I understand that there are better ballistics with it but are there any downsides other than the price/availability of ammo? On average you’ll need a heavier 7mm bullet which will produce more recoil IN AN ULTRALIGHT rifle like the one I’m putting together for this project. Looking for previous installments of our "Head to Head" series? joe November 26, 2015 at 8:52 pm. I don't like recoil but the 270 WSM dosen't seem to bother me. Very light recoil even with 100gr bullets. Tighten that twist up to 1:8″ or 1:8.5″, and you’d certainly be able to push the 170-grain bullets, like the Berger Extreme Outer Limits line, with the truly high B.C. is several pounds heavier and I use around 11-12 grs. It was in 2003, as Winchester was unveiling the follow-up cartridges to their .300 Winchester Short Magnum that the second .270 came to bear the Winchester moniker. I do not agree with .270 recoil being the same as an 30-06 in the same weight rifle. (I have shot my dad's .270 win.) With the bullets available in the 1920s and 30s, it showed its limits on elk and the larger cervids—Elmer Keith certainly took exception to using the fast/light combination on game of this caliber—but the .270 was an undeniable deer killer. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, bullet weight, or jacketing type. I figured the bore was only 0.013 smaller but I'd have access to more options for reloading. The velocity increase comes via a … the .270 WSM certainly has the power to be a good 1000 yard shooter. vs. 7mm Rem. If you don't reload stick with the 06 family. I do not agree with .270 recoil being the same as an 30-06 in the same weight rifle.
Uscis Corbin Production Facility Mail, Bright Starts Swing Manual, Male Secretary Meme, Best Thermal Monocular 2020, Candy Apple Red Paint With Gold Flakes, Sccm Failed To Signin Bgb Client With Error = 80004005,